I must say, having a relationship go South after an engagement is a tuff thing to go through. On top of your emotions going through a ringer, you then have to explain to all your friends, family, relatives, etc. why they need to return the engagement gifts.
Brutal.
After that's done, you can then start working your way through the stages of healing (source: wikipedia);
Denial:
Example - "I feel fine."; "This can't be happening."
Anger:
Example - "Why me? It's not fair!" "NO! NO! How can you accept this!"
Bargaining:
Example - "Just let me live to see my children graduate."; "I'll do anything, can't you stretch it out? A few more years."
Depression:
Example - "I'm so sad, why bother with anything?"; "I'm going to die . . . What's the point?"
Acceptance:
Example - "It's going to be OK."; "I can't fight it, I may as well prepare for it."
Based on the newspaper ad that appeared in today's paper (Mt. Juliet News EXTRA Vol. 2 No. 26, page 7), it's pretty apparent that "Pauly Bear" has definitely hit stage two "anger". And boy has he taken it to new heights.
My reactions have been mixed. At first, I was dumbfounded. Then I questioned whether this was real or some kind of weird, misplaced joke. I mean, talk about letting her have it with both shotgun barrels by referring to her as a "nightmare" -- DANG!
5 Responses to “I Don’t - Pauly Bear Publicly Breaks Off Engagement with Snoogum”
1
Tracey 11 July 2008 @ 4:47 pm
I know Tammy. She’s a friend. This guy is a complete stalker. he’s mad because he lost his bread and butter. oh darn, now he has to work for a living.Not to mention he has the brains of a chair.
2
Michael 11 July 2008 @ 7:43 pm
Hi Tracey -
It’s a pretty harsh ad. If Tammy feels so inclined, I invite her to post her own “engagement off” comment here. Then again, she just may want to let it be and put it all behind her.
Best to both parties.
3
Cal Finch 24 July 2008 @ 1:39 pm
This is the funniest thing I have ever seen! LOL!! Maybe this chick was a nightmare, there are two sides to every story. I read that she’s trying to sue the newspapers for printing the ad. Is she stupid? It’s not their fault he posted this ad. It wasn’t pornographic nor offensive and I believe there’s a little thing called the Second Amendment that protects…(lol) Pauly Bear!
This at best would be one of those frivolous lawsuits that waste time and money. Tracey, if you are her friend please ask her not to waste the taxpayers time and money by going after the newspapers. Is she trying to make a quick buck or what? Count it as a lesson learned, move on, and keep this mess out of our courts. Hell! Take it to Springer or Steve Wilkos. That’s where nonsense like this belongs!
4
None 28 July 2008 @ 3:13 pm
Cal -
The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms among other things.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and religion.
5
Hex 28 July 2008 @ 4:18 pm
From what I heard about her side? They were never engaged to begin with. Sending copies to her workplace is deifnitely harrassment - and NO amendments protect you in that case.
Grab some RSS love.
5 Responses to “I Don’t - Pauly Bear Publicly Breaks Off Engagement with Snoogum”
1 Tracey 11 July 2008 @ 4:47 pm
I know Tammy. She’s a friend. This guy is a complete stalker. he’s mad because he lost his bread and butter. oh darn, now he has to work for a living.Not to mention he has the brains of a chair.
2 Michael 11 July 2008 @ 7:43 pm
Hi Tracey -
It’s a pretty harsh ad. If Tammy feels so inclined, I invite her to post her own “engagement off” comment here. Then again, she just may want to let it be and put it all behind her.
Best to both parties.
3 Cal Finch 24 July 2008 @ 1:39 pm
This is the funniest thing I have ever seen! LOL!! Maybe this chick was a nightmare, there are two sides to every story. I read that she’s trying to sue the newspapers for printing the ad. Is she stupid? It’s not their fault he posted this ad. It wasn’t pornographic nor offensive and I believe there’s a little thing called the Second Amendment that protects…(lol) Pauly Bear!
This at best would be one of those frivolous lawsuits that waste time and money. Tracey, if you are her friend please ask her not to waste the taxpayers time and money by going after the newspapers. Is she trying to make a quick buck or what? Count it as a lesson learned, move on, and keep this mess out of our courts. Hell! Take it to Springer or Steve Wilkos. That’s where nonsense like this belongs!
4 None 28 July 2008 @ 3:13 pm
Cal -
The Second Amendment protects the right to bear arms among other things.
The First Amendment protects freedom of speech and religion.
5 Hex 28 July 2008 @ 4:18 pm
From what I heard about her side? They were never engaged to begin with. Sending copies to her workplace is deifnitely harrassment - and NO amendments protect you in that case.
Leave a Reply